| 
  • If you are citizen of an European Union member nation, you may not use this service unless you are at least 16 years old.

  • You already know Dokkio is an AI-powered assistant to organize & manage your digital files & messages. Very soon, Dokkio will support Outlook as well as One Drive. Check it out today!

View
 

_all_about_Facebook_en

Page history last edited by paolo_del_bene 10 years, 8 months ago

Subject: net neutrality, [violated privacy and security of Internet users]
Date: Friday, December 14, 2012 at 11:53 p.m.
To: "Mr. President Martin Schulz"

Dear Mr. President Martin Schulz,
 

These evening, i'm here to tell you that  Facebook with its own iLike button, is putting at risk the World Wide Web and is violating the privacy and security of each user who uses the internet.
 

All the guys / girls think that the button iLike is only a tool to say: iLike it.
 

In fact the button iLike is a backdoor!

 
What is a backdoor?


It is an unauthorized access on the computers of users, so that Facebook can will acquire data from users, violating their privacy and their safety, so i'm here to ask you to discuss regard this, to the European Parliament, concerning this damage created by Facebook.

 
In the past, Chancellor Angela Merkel said it was a risk to the privacy of Tedesdca Public Administration, Public Administration and the European Union.

 
In Germany the iLike button has been removed from any website.

 
I know that in other European Union countries, have failed to remove the iLike button.
 

Today i am here to tell you President Martin Schulz: please ask the Italian government to make remove the iLike button from any website, even from that of Facebook.

 

https://www.datenschutzzentrum.de/presse/20110819-facebook-en.htm

I hope to receive your reply as soon as possible,

Yours faithfully,

Paolo Del Bene

 

 

Subject: [Net Neutrality], "violated the privacy, security of users in the NETWORK"!!]
Date: Thursday, May 9, 2013 02:20 a.m.
To: NSA

Dear NSA;

Herewith, I inform you that honestly, I do not understand how whitehouse.gov nsa.gov ..... may authorize the use of Facebook.


And with this, my, I want to shed some light in this regard.
 

In the past I wrote to Mr. Martin Schulz, who is President of the European Parliament and member of the Social Democratic Party "German" SPD ", asking him to shed light on such facts and to prohibit the use of key iLike, for simple reason that it is a backdoor.
 

Facebook is really a backdoor, because it can have access on the computers of end users, by remote control, and can spy on them.


Spies on them in real life, and enter into the merits of privacy.
 

This is an easy way to spy on people.
 

In this way there is no need of any jurisdiction over other countries to know what a person or persons have done.
 

Without any authorization from the judges, magistrates, lawyers, people are spied on, violating the privacy of millions of people around the world.
 

Facebook is born in the USA, and if it is authorized, it may do so, only if required by the U.S. government, but can not immagazzinar data, classify them, to decide what to publish (or unpublish == censorship) in the name of defense of its own users.
 

The First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, defend freedom of speech.
 

Not a single decision may be made about what could be considered good or bad taste, for American citizens, without recourse to earlier judgments.
 

USA vs Larry Flynt!
 

Can not be a FaceBook who can decide what can be published or unpublished.
 

At the same time, who can retrace their steps, may be just the Supreme Court of the United States of America, which is FREE to make a decision about the freedom of speech.
 

If Facebook is authorized and may decide in the name of defense of its members, I think it will have an explicit authorization signed by the Government United States of America for Facebook, on the contrary, if Facebook does not have permission, can spy on users, as in the U.S., as in the rest of the world.
 

Every nation has its own constitution, and the U.S. Constitution may not have a primary role on the Constitutions of other nations.
 

So, I think that Facebook is not authorized to: store and classify the users' data in their servers.

Waiting for your reply which I hope comes soon as possible,

Regards,

Paolo Del Bene

 

 

Subject: [Net Neutrality], "violated the privacy, security of untenti in NETWORK"!!]
Date: Mon, 20 May 2013 6:37 A.M.
To: "Mr Tim Berners-Lee"

Mr Tim Berners Lee,
 

With the herewith i inform you that: I, you, the FSF, FFII, RIPE, ARIN, W3C, we have the same idea about the World Wide Web


The fact is that only you can tell if something is good for a "Free Democracy" for the "Net Neutrality".
If you want, you have the power to say: "FaceBook", "Twitter", "YouTube", "Linkedin", "Friendster", and tube of porn (which are many) on the World Wide Web, should not use:


*. Aac, *. Aiff, *. Au, * avi, *. Bmp, *. Doc, *. Flv, *. Gif, *. Htm, *. Jpeg, *. Mov, *. Mpeg, *. Mp3 , *. mp4, *. MV4, *. pdf, *. ppt, *. rtf, *. swf, *. wmv, *. xml, *. xls and Adobe flash for the World Wide Web, it has a single particular: the animation! .


It is non Free Software, and a bad software is non-free software, is bugged, and does not guarantee any freedom to the users, who instead are guaranteed through the GNU General Public License!

Another problem is that: flash, today is good for a fast PC, but tomorrow the same PC,  will not be faster, and when a person will have to visit a website, you may wait several minutes, with the risk that the website expires, while is loading.


Another problem is that flash, supports only Microsoft Windows, and flash was banned from mac os x of Steve Jobs, for these problems.


Another fact: ADOBE hackers put in the position of having to develop: GET-FLASH; GNASH, NO-SCRIPT.

If the World Wide Web was really "free", these corporations would not have a way to do the good or the bad times, depending on what goes on in his head.

You are is the only the one who can say INTERNET:
 

"I do not want the use of non-free software, i want will be used Free Software 100 percent, i want will be used codecs Free Software 100 percent as: *. Mkv, *. Oga, *. Ogg, *. OGV ..
 

I do not want the use of: *. Doc, *. Pdf, *. Ppt, *. Xls, *. RTF
 

I want will be used: *. Dbk, *. Html, *. Odt, *. Ps, *. Tex, *. Texi, *. Txt
 

I do not want the use of: *. Bmp, *. Gif, *. Jpeg ....
 

I want will be used: *. Png, *. Svg
 

I do not want will be used Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, Friendster,
 

I suggest the use IRC Internet Relay Chat, GNUsocial, and others, as described in the http://www.gnu.org/consensus/manifesto

You have a great power, and can force the WWW for codecs which are 100 percent Free Software, Free Software and protocols for the connection.


Please help the campaign against DRM, I ask you kindly to read: http://www.defectivebydesign.org/no-drm-in-html5


However, there are protocols Free Software as BATMAN , Babel, Robin, BMX, OLSR, such as the ability to have a Wi-Fi router with "OpenWRT GNU/linux."

I spent my last 12 years campaigning against the non-free software, and support of Free Software, 100 percent.
 

Over the years, we got to see grow Linux distributions 100 percent Free Software such as:
GNU/linux Blag; GNU/linux Dragora; GNU/linux Dynebolic, GNU/linux gNewSense; GNU/linux Musix ; GNU/linux Parabola; GNU/linux Trisquel; GNU/linux Ututo.

Here you can see why was decided to give support GNU/linux distributions which are 100 percent Free Software: http://www.gnu.org/distros/free-distros.html

 

And here, for what reason, was decided do not support and spread distributions 100 percent non-free software: http://www.gnu.org/distros/common-distros.html


Currently, the community needs support and development, for what concerns the GNU / HURD.
The community of the project GNU'S Not Unix! is working on GNU / kFreeBSD and third party developers have long realized FreeVMS and distributed under the terms of the GNU General Public License Version 3.

Regards,

Paolo Del Bene

 

From: Paolo De Bene

Date: Friday, 02 August, 11:15:00 p.m.

To: World Wide Web

 

In my last thread published on http://www.zeusnews.it/index.php3?ar=stampa&cod=19379 Friday, 2 June 2013, i spoken about the dangers resulting from Facebook.

 

Zeusnews decided to remove the thread, saiyng that was off-topic or non-conforming.

 

This is false !!!!

 

The thread was a news published on: http://www.fsf.org/facebook where Matt Lee and John Sullivan, in 20  December 2010 spoken about the risks resulting from Facebook.

 

Mark Zuckerberg is TIME Magazine's Person of the Year? Where's the "dislike" button?

 

by Matt Lee and John Sullivan Contributions Published on Dec 20, 2010 03:11 PM
TIME Magazine praises Mark Zuckerberg for creating a system that has connected people around the world with each other.
Unfortunately, the terms under which he claims to have done this set a terrible precedent for our future — for our control over the software we use to interact with each other, for control over our data, and for our privacy. The damage is not limited to Facebook users. Because so many sites — including TIME — use Facebook's user-tracking "Like" button, Zuckerberg is able to collect information about people who aren't even users of his site. These are precedents which hurt our ability to freely connect with each other. He has created a network that is first and foremost a gold mine for government surveillance and advertisers.

 

This much is evident from Facebook's outward behavior — but things could actually be much worse than we know. Facebook's users are not connecting directly with each other. They are speaking to

Mr. Zuckerberg, who first writes down and files away everything said, and then maybe relays it to the intended destination, if it suits him. In some cases he does not — witness the recent reports of Facebook's messaging service blocking messages based on the words and links in them, because those links point to services which Facebook would prefer we not discuss.

 

Fortunately, there are many efforts underway to provide distributed, user-controlled services to facilitate connection between people, including GNU social, status.net, Crabgrass, Appleseed and Diaspora. These services will not have the same kinds of problems, because both the communication-handling code and the communication data will be in the hands of the people doing the communicating.

 

These efforts will eventually succeed. We hope that when they do, TIME will remedy its mistaken reasoning by awarding the Person of the Year appropriately.

Not f'd — you won't find me on Facebook

Copy and paste this code for your own website!
<a href="http://www.fsf.org/fb"><img src="http://static.fsf.org/nosvn/no-facebook-me.png" alt="Not f'd — you won't find me on Facebook" /></a>

 

In the meantime, you can encourage people not to connect with Zuckerberg while thinking that they are connecting with you, by putting this button on your blog or web site, with a link to whatever method you would prefer they use to contact you directly — maybe your http://identi.ca or other status.net account.

Alternatively, you could point it at this post or any of the better articles pointing out the problems with Facebook, such as "With friends like these ..." by Tom Hodgkinson, or the resources available at http://autonomo.us — especially the "Franklin Street Statement on Freedom and Network Services".

Our button, of course, is not linked to any surveillance database or tracking system.

Note: You may find some pages about the FSF or GNU on Facebook, since anyone can create pages there. Know that these pages are unofficial and not maintained by FSF staff or the GNU Project, nor did we ask for them to be created.

 

Download our dislike button and put it on your website, or print your own dislike stickers.

 

All buttons released under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license.

Please feel free to change the buttons, but keep both of the creator names intact, and make sure your buttons are under the same license.

 

Comments (0)

You don't have permission to comment on this page.